Getting to a Final Image - some words on editing photos for a new photographer
The typical way to get into editing is mechanical. People learn some photo-editing techniques or tricks and then they want to use them - soon and often. When all you have is a new hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Witness the typical output of photographers new to editing doing selective color or heavy vignettes. That attitude unfortunately goes along with considering the taking of pictures as a mechanical procedure with some tiny bit of artistry spread or just sprinkled on top.
Sometimes, people new to the editing process think the solution is to find and use a 'workflow' as if having a recipe will guide them in post-processing. That's like thinking that developing a project plan to build a building is the same thing as designing it.
The first thing that must be learned about post-processing is not the 'how' but the 'what.' And deciding what to do is the difficult part, learning to look at images and understand what issues stand between as the image is currently and what it could be.
Once those issues of what to do to the image are identified then those changes can be fit into a workflow to bring the image to its potential.
The most difficult thing about editing one's own image is to be objective about it. After all, the maker identified the image as having something interesting, worth capturing and rendering and thus is tied to the image as it is in his/her mind's eye.
How can the maker, especially someone relatively new to this, somehow step back and un-see the image, detach themselves emotionally and look at it with a cold, critical eye in order to identify weaknesses?
I suggest this.
First, allow a day or so between your first viewing and the final editing to allow that first rush of enthusiasm to fade. Forget about it a little, allow time to break a little bit of the bond that formed between you and the mental image so you can look at the actual image afresh.
Does the picture have close to the impact you want, is the content all there, is there enough detail, is there enough exposure so that you can work with it? If so, or even if just possibly so, then break down your assessment of the image into small measurable chunks, where you look at specific items and decide whether items that seem 'wrong' should be or can be changed. You need specifics here to keep you on task and away from falling in love with the image in your mind again. Deal with the image on your screen.
Sometimes, you actually may have to start some of the post-processing to decide whether it is worthwhile to go on. For example, if there is considerable perspective distortion, correcting this may remove too much of the structures being photographed to allow a satisfactory result. Or when a shadow must be lightened a bit, the resultant color noise may be too much to be tolerated. There is no harm in taking a step or two just to evaluate the situation.
These are some of the questions I ask myself when I look at a picture to decide what items need to be considered in a post-processing workflow.
After doing this kind of image evaluation for a while, one doesn't need to dwell specifically on questions and the evaluation will become unscripted and automatic.
My workflow for corrections follows fairly closely the structure of a Lightroom Development module with some minor deviations.
First I look at global issues that might cause me to reject the image out of hand.
As much as possible I correct any perspective distortion and deviation from horizontals/verticals to be certain I can get the horizontals and verticals to look the way I want them and then I crop it to the desired framing. There is no sense going any further if the viewer will always be disturbed by basic framing issues that detract from the impact. If it can't be made to look good here, I just abandon the effort.
Then I make global changes in exposure, white balance, tint and contrast so that I can be certain the detail and tone will be there in the final image. Another point at which I could abandon the image.
I usually do these early global corrections in Lightroom but rarely do non-global edits here because I like the flexibility and power of Photoshop.
After exporting to PS and doing a global noise reduction, I work on area specific changes in exposure and sharpness, enhancing areas that I want to be seen and diminishing the impact of areas that don't contribute and I don't want to impact the viewer but are included in the frame. Virtually every one of these steps is done on separate named layers.
When I get to a 'final', I save the file, layers intact, and leave it for day or so to marinate and for me to get some distance. Eventually I come back to it and fiddle around with it again. When I am happy with the final, I collapse as many layers as I can and save the Photoshop file.
Note that all of these decisions require the maker have an idea of the endpoint that she/he wants to reach.
There are no rules, there are only ideas and opinions - and to be a photographer, to do your post-processing, you must have opinions about what is good and ideas about what you want to achieve.
Once you have a goal, then the path is easily found.
thank you for pointing me to this particular blog.As you said,regarding the digest/rest,return analogy,this blog will be returned to.
Thanks for referring me to this. "When all you have is a new hammer, everything looks like a nail." Made me laugh a bit. Defiantly how I feel starting out. Excellent guide. I will give this a shot in my next project.
No comments posted.
(For some odd reason the option to subscribe by email is given above and the option to subscribe using an RSS reader is below the following text. you figure that out.)
Recent PostsThe Salt of the Earth – a film about Sebastiao Salgado - review The Rules of Composition, The Rules of Art. Is post processing cheating? Combat Photography An Approach to Post Processing. Using Fluorouracil for Actinic Keratosis - case study Review: Focal Point: Fine Art and Creative Photography - MD Fed Art Review- Naturevisions Traveling Exhibit at the Oakland Mills Interfaith Center Review-Six Artists, Two Great Shows Review: Karsh and Winogrand – both shows in Washington and both revealing.